Russia Seeks Substantial Amount in Compensation from Clearing House Regarding Frozen Funds
Russia's monetary authority has announced it is claiming compensation totaling $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.
The Substantial Demand
Based on accounts in local state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.
European Union officials are set to determine later this week on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and economic stability.
The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.
Dispute on Ownership
EU authorities have argued that their plan is legally sound. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.
The Russian government, however, has called any use of the assets as theft. It has threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing European corporate holdings within Russia.
The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.
Geopolitical Maneuvering
In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."
The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
Although courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.
"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be located," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.
EU Countermeasures
European authorities said they are developing measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."
How the Funding Would Work
Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.
Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the ongoing war.
Other Funding Ideas
The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.
Such a proposal, however, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.
Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "It also sends a clear signal that if you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."